Why does git create a merge commit?
Those commits are because your coworker had committed some work on their local branch and then pulled new commits from the remote.
The key being that git pull is a combination of two git commands, git fetch and git merge .
The commits can be avoided by running git pull –rebase origin master ..
How do I rebase a commit?
Find commit on top of which you want to move the branch to – call it new parent. In the exampe that’s B. You need to be on your branch (the one you move): Apply your rebase: git rebase –onto
How do I change a merge commit message?
On the command line, navigate to the repository that contains the commit you want to amend. Use the git rebase -i HEAD~n command to display a list of the last n commits in your default text editor. Replace pick with reword before each commit message you want to change.
What type of merge creates a new merge commit?
Explicit merges are the default merge type. The ‘explicit’ part is that they create a new merge commit.
How do merge commits work?
Whether branches are created for testing, bug fixes, or other reasons, merging commits changes to another location. To be more specific, merging takes the contents of a source branch and integrates them with a target branch. In this process, only the target branch is changed. The source branch history remains the same.
What is Git merge commit?
Git merging combines sequences of commits into one unified history of commits. There are two main ways Git will merge: Fast Forward and Three way. Git can automatically merge commits unless there are changes that conflict in both commit sequences.
What is difference between Merge and rebase?
Git Rebase vs. Git rebase and merge both integrate changes from one branch into another. … Git rebase moves a feature branch into a master. Git merge adds a new commit, preserving the history.
Can you rebase a merge commit?
Use git rebase -r if you want to preserve the merge commits. … The good way is to use rebase, but once we rebase this branch onto master, all merge commits are gone. Following GIF shows how such a rebase operation omits all merge commits: The new option –rebase-merges prevents this problem.
Should I rebase or merge?
For individuals, rebasing makes a lot of sense. If you want to see the history completely same as it happened, you should use merge. Merge preserves history whereas rebase rewrites it . Rebasing is better to streamline a complex history, you are able to change the commit history by interactive rebase.